|
|
Tug & Tow
In the Matter of the Complaint of JR&C Marine, Inc. as Owner of
the Tug CHEYENNE, for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability,
Civil Action No. 2:00cv878, Eastern District of Virginia, Norfolk Division.
Represented tug owner petitioning for exoneration from or
limitation of liability arising out of a casualty in which crane barge
in tow struck overhead power lines. Settled on favorable terms with
power company for damages, and went to trial against crane operating
company on issue of apportioned fault for contribution. Decision by
the Court is pending.
In the Matter of the Complaint of D&H Corp. (Tug LIBRA Limitation
Proceedings), 1994 A.M.C. 2285, 1994 WL 574143 (E.D.Va. 1992).
We represented the Owner of the Tug LIBRA in a limitation
proceeding arising out of the sinking of Transerve's Barge RYAN. Claim
were filed by Dow and Georgia Gulf, the owners of parcels of caustic
soda carried in the barge, who claimed in tort for breach of a towage
contract. The District Court granted our motion for summary judgment,
holding that the contract was one of carriage, not towage, and Tug LIBRA
was able to limit its liability under the terms of the contract of affreightment.
The claim of Transerve was settled on favorable terms.
In the Matter of the Complaint of D&H Corp. a Owner, and C&P
Towing Company, Inc. (Tug ANN K.), Civil Action No. 2:91cv567, Eastern
District of Virginia - Norfolk Division
Represented towing company in defense of action by owners
of barge and its cargo of grain which capsized and sank while in tow
on the Chesapeake Bay. Tried June 17-18, 1992, before the Honorable
Robert M. Payne, U.S. District Judge. Settled on favorable terms (approximately
one-thirds) following oral argument, while awaiting judgment.
Cargill, Inc. v. C&P Towing Company, Inc. (Tug RANDY D.), Civil
Action No. 89-378-N, Eastern District of Virginia - Norfolk Division
Represented towing company in defense of action by owner
of barge and its cargo of grain which capsized and sank while in tow
on the Chesapeake Bay. Tried from January 15-18, 1990, before the Honorable
Tommy E. Miller, U.S. Magistrate. Effectively used expert witnesses
to prove defense theory of the case and disprove Plaintiff's theories
to exonerate the tug. Cargill, Inc. v. C&P Towing, Inc (Tug RANDY
D.)., 1991 A.M.C. 101 (E.D. Va 1990), aff'd 943 F.2d 48 (Table, Text
in WESTLAW), unpublished disposition, 1991 WL 181142, 1992 A.M.C. 304,
1992 A.M.C. 392 (4th Cir. 1991).
Kiewit Eastern Company v. The Tug MORANIA NO. 24 in rem, et. al.,
Civil Action No. 87-324-N, Eastern District of Virginia - Norfolk Division
Represented Morania Oil Tanker Corporation and its tug and
barge in an action brought by Kiewit Eastern Company for damages arising
out of an allision by Morania's tug and barge with Kiewit's cofferdam
in use in constructing the new Campostella bridge over the Eastern Branch
of the Elizabeth River. Kiewit claimed damages of $175,000, and Morania
made an offer of judgment of $71,000. The case was tried before the
Honorable J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr. from April 6-8, 1988. Morania defended
on the grounds that the cofferdam was an obstruction to navigation not
properly marked in accordance with Coast Guard requirements under the
bridge permit and that the damages claimed by Kiewit were excessive.
Judge Clarke ruled in favor of Plaintiff on liability only.
For damages, Judge Clarke not only accepted Defendant's theory, but
used that theory to establish precedential guidelines for the computation
of damages and entered a judgment order limiting Plaintiff's damages
to $67,816.54.
Salter Marine Inc. v. Conti Carriers & Terminals, Inc., 677
F.2d 388, 1993 A.M.C. 2399 [DRO] (4th Cir. 1982) aff'd in part and remanding
1981 A.M.C. 2944 (E.D.Va. 1981)
Phil represented the owner of a tug which lost a barge loaded
with grain due to capsizing. Tug settled with grain cargo owner and
proceeded with third party claim for indemnity against stevedore who
loaded barge with a list. The court held that stevedore breached its
warranty of workmanlike service, which ran not only to barge owner but
also to towing tug, and awarded indemnity.
|
 |